Law Philosophers Assignment

Philosophers subsidisation Aristotle was natural in 384 B. C. E until 322 B. C. E. He was a Greek philosopher who lived in Stagira in compass north Greece. He was the son of Nichomachus, Aristotle analyse medicine and then in 367 BCE he was then sent to capital of Greece to carry philosophy. He has stayed and studied at Platos academy until 347 BCE, he had a distinct idea then Plato. Aristotle hoped The just thereof means that which is constabularyful and that which is concern or fair(Morris, 1981) When Plato had died Aristotle was non the head of Platos Academy.Aristotle left capital of Greece he went traveling maybe studying in Turkey, which employ to be called Asia Minor. In 338 he returned backward to Mace get dressedian and had tutored horse parsley the Great, subsequent Alexander the Great had taken over Athens, Aristotle had returned to Athens to plumeup his own school called Lyceum. later Alexander the Great passed forward Athens attacked Macedonian and Ari stotle blandal situation became risky. He fled off and went to Eubroea where he has later passed away in 322 B. C. E. Aristotle believed in egalitarian caller were he believed that everyone should sh atomic number 18 equally.He believed that if pot ar unequal they may be shell out unequal shares (Morris 1981). Thomas doubting Thomas was natural in Lombardy, Italy in 1225 and later passed away in 1274 he lived solely 49 years. He was born in his familys castle in the kingdom of Naples, he had eight siblings and he was the youngest of them all. At the era of five he had been drawn into a school at Montecassino. He was later transferred to University of Naples. He came into contact with Aristotle, and became a friar preacher over the disputes of his family and then he headed north to study.Briefly in Paris, and then he went onto a different school called Cologne were he was with Albert the Great, he later studied technology at the University of Paris he became an intelligent in philosophy and in other works of Aristotle. He believed that natural natural law is in the main ordained to the common reliable and object of lawmaker should be to lead gay to virtue (Our healthy Herit climb on, 92) He did not assume that law makes people good, except rather that man obeys a law due to him being good(Philosophers of law of nature, Note) Noam Chomsky is born on December 7th, 928 in Philadelphia he was Jewish born philosopher who had clear his PhD in linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania. Since 1955 he was a professor at MlT and had made spectacular theories on human linguistic ability. Chomsky had a little brother named David his family was a spunk pattern family. Noam Chomsky grew up watching officers elude wo hands in front of a cloth pile. His mother Elise Chomsky was an active radical politic in the 1930s his father William Chomsky who was a Russian Jewish Immigrant. Chomsky at the age of ten-spot years old had create verbally a newspa per editorial on the rise of fascism in Europe.He believes that law chiefly serves those in power. Cooperation among the privileged associate and of citizens and lawmakers to make laws that maintain the statuesque and wealthiness and power of the rich. Aristotle would evaluate Canadian truth is he would like how we have the Canadian mesh of Rights and Freedoms he would like voice 15 sub component partalization (1) in the pick out which is Equality Rights every individual is equal before and under the law and has the ripe(p) to the equal protection and equal take in of the law Constitution Act, 1982).This holds with Aristotle because he to a fault said that everyone is equal and should be tough the analogous. Also he would make on section 7 of the Charter Legal Rights Everyone has the secure to life, liberty and security(Constitution Act, 1982). Aristotle would agree with this because it shows that everyone has the equal rights for life and humanity. He would agree t hat taxing the wealthy would be good because it lessens the chance of them overruling.He believes that everyone should be toughened equally, so in Canadian law the same cases placet be treated the same way as other. He would believe that Canadian law would be a worry because he wants everyone to be treated the same. He would also discord with welfare because it takes away our money that we earned by working hard for. He would also have a problem with one receiver getting elective because of insincere information being employ to be a ruler of a country. Aristotle would believe that our laws our good and it could be dreary at the same time.Thomas Aquinas would believe that the Canadian law would improve or expand on his theories of people. In section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms the rights and isolateddoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as terminate be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society(Canadia n Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982). He would agree with this because it shows that man can be free but it is up to them if they want to obey the law.It is basically stating Aquinas theory that man obeys a law due to him being good it is a guideline to show you are free but remember there are laws if you do some function wrong. He would disagree with Canadas legal system because he was a big believer in his faith, which was Christianity he would agree much on the ten commandments because they show one ruler and they say that you cant do this or that so they are laws that over rule men. Which didnt agree with his theory that men obey law and law doesnt obey men.Noam Chomsky would evaluate Canadian Law as positive and negative thing because it shows that media is controlled by the government and also by the wealthy. Noam Chomsky believed that media only benefits the elite class. He believes that the rich should get richer and the brusque get poorer. beneath section 15 sub secti on 1 equal benefit of the law without discrimination basically Noam Chomsky would agree with this because it shows that everyone should be treated the same but dont discriminate if you are poor or rich.Chomsky believes that the media only benefits with the elite class but in Canadian Law he efficacy disagree freedom of speech because the media is controlled by the rich and whatsoever the rich say goes it could be false information, but with freedom of speech you can go to people and spread the word. Everyone has the right to speak and also he might disagree with the Canadian government for spending money funding Iraq and other countries. Noam Chomsky a 20th and 21st century philosopher he is still alive so he can compare the difference between his theories and the Canadian Law.Citations Blair, A. , Ryan Elliott, K. , Manning, B. , & Mossuto, M. (2004). Canadian and international law. Canada Oxford University Press. McGilvray James, A. (1994). Noam chomsky . Retrieved from http// www. biography. com/people/noam-chomsky-37616 McInerny, R. (Sept, 2009 30). Metaphysics research lab, csli, stanford university. Retrieved from http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/aquinas/ Waggone , B. (2000, June 09). University of california museum of paleontology. Retrieved from http//www. ucmp. berkeley. edu/ level/aristotle. html